毕业论文论文范文课程设计实践报告法律论文英语论文教学论文医学论文农学论文艺术论文行政论文管理论文计算机安全
您现在的位置: 毕业论文 >> 论文 >> 正文

地区发展差距的衡量与缩小的路径 第5页

更新时间:2010-1-17:  来源:毕业论文
地区发展差距的衡量与缩小的路径 第5页
FIFTY YEARS OF REGIONAL INEQUALITY IN CHINA:
A JOURNEY THROUGH CENTRAL PLANNING, REFORM AND OPENNESS
Ravi Kanbur & Xiaobo Zhang
American
The UNU/WIDER Project Conference on Spatial Inequality in Asia, United Nations University Centre, Tokyo, 28-29 March 2003

Abstract: This paper constructs and analyses a long run time series for regional inequality in China from the Communist Revolution to the present. There have been three peaks of inequality in the last fifty years, coinciding with the Great Famine of the late 1950s, the Cultural Revolution of the late 1960s and 1970s, and finally the period of openness and global integration in the late 1990s. Econometric analysis establishes that regional inequality is explained in the different phases by three key policy variables-he ratio of heavy industry to gross output value, the degree of decentralization, and the degree of openness.
Keywords: Inequality, polarization, decentralization, industrialization, openness, globalization, Chinese economy.
3. Inequality Change through the Phases of Chinese History: A Narrative
Following standard discussions, Communist Chinese history can be divided into several phases: 1949-56 (Revolution and Land Reform), 1957-61 (The Great Leap Forward and the Great Famine), 1962-65 (Post-Famine Recovery), 1966-78 (Cultural Revolution and Transition to Reform), 1979-84 (Rural Reform) and 1985-present (Post Rural Reform, Decentralization and Opening up to Trade and Foreign Direct Investment).
Table 1 presents economic indicators for China from 1952 to 2000. It includes three key indicators of economic policy—the share of heavy industry in gross value of total output (a measure of the bias against agriculture and China’s comparative advantage), the ratio of trade volume to total GDP (a measure of the degree of openness), and the ratio of local government expenditure to total government expenditure (a measure of decentralization). Figure 1 shows the evolution of real per capita GDP through the different phases identified above. Table 2 presents long-run inequality series, and Figure 2 graphs the evolution of Chinese regional inequality, as measured by the Gini and the GE(the generalized entropy index)indices, through the six phases of development identified above. The two indices move in close relation to each other, and match the different phases of Chinese development remarkably well.
Inequality was relatively low and steady in the early first years of communist rule when land reform was introduced. However, it rose precipitously during the Great Leap Forward and the Great Famine, reaching to a peak in 1960. It fell during the recovery from the Great Famine, reaching a trough in 1967. But the effects of the Cultural Revolution, which began in late 1966, started an increase in inequality which peaked in 1976. The transition from the Cultural Revolution to the period of rural reform saw a decline in inequality which gathered pace in the early 1980s and reached its trough in 1984. In the post rural reform period after 1984, when China decentralized, opened up and experienced an explosion of trade and foreign direct investment, inequality rose steadily and sharply right through to the end of our data series, in 2000.
Thus over the past fifty years inequality has peaked three times—during the Great Famine, at the end of the Cultural Revolution, and in the current period of global integration. In fact, the Gini coefficient of regional inequality in China in 2000 exceeds the peaks of inequality reached at the end of the Cultural Revolution in 1976, and at the Great Famine in 1960. Using the Gini coefficient, inequality in 2000 is about 16 percent higher than that in 1960.
Similarly, there are three major troughs in the overall evolution of inequality—in 1952, right at the beginning of the data series; in 1967, at the end of the recovery from the Great Famine and before the effects of the Cultural Revolution set in; and in 1984, at the end of the rural reform period and the start of the expansion based on global integration. Overall, inequality seems to have been low when policy was encouraging to agriculture and the rural sector generally and high when this sector was relatively neglected. These effects can be further investigated by decomposing overall inequality into sub-components and examining the evolution of these components.

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]  ... 下一页  >> 

地区发展差距的衡量与缩小的路径 第5页下载如图片无法显示或论文不完整,请联系qq752018766
设为首页 | 联系站长 | 友情链接 | 网站地图 |

copyright©751com.cn 辣文论文网 严禁转载
如果本毕业论文网损害了您的利益或者侵犯了您的权利,请及时联系,我们一定会及时改正。