情绪智力情绪管理外文文献及翻译 第4页
最后, 我们认为目前的研究结果表明,与情感有关的行为不仅可以在传统意义上评估自我个性,而且从概念上的关联,也足以表现独特的措施。似乎是无关情报认知成分和待使用的情报为拟议EI型部件, 建立以绩效为基础的观念,情感有关的行为能力,来区分和反省人际情感的能力,似乎是有道理的和有意义的。
原文:
Emotional intelligence: The convergent and discriminant validities of intra-and interpersonal emotional abilities
Abstract
Despite the encouraging evidence for the convergent and discriminant validities of maximum-performance measures of emotional abilities, the present study draws the attention to a potential limitation of this measurement approach. Scales purporting to assess emotional management tend to measure the individual’s knowledge of how to behave, and not their actual emotional management ability per se. To reduce this limitation, we have taken efforts towards the development and validation of performance measures of intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional abilities that assess the effectiveness or adequacy of an individual’s typical behaviour in emotional situations more directly. These measures have been administered in a study with 277 participants along with a self-developed questionnaire on self-assessed emotional abilities, various subscales of a multidimensional intelligence test, the I-S-T 2000 (Amthauer, Brocke, Liepmann, & Beauducel, 1999), and the German NEO-FFI (Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1993). The findings yielded largely expected convergent and discriminant relations of performance measures of intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional ab辣-文^论,文.网
http://www.751com.cn ilities to self-estimate of the respective abilities as well as to personality traits. However, no substantial associations were found with cognitive intelligence components.
Keywords: Emotional Intelligence, Personality, Big Five, Intelligence
1. Introduction
In the last decade, several conceptualizations of emotional intelligence (EI) have been proposed (for reviews see Matthews et al., 2002, Mayer et al., 2000 and Neubauer and Freudenthaler, 2005), which can be classified into two fairly distinct groups, that is, “ability or information processing models” (Mayer & Salovey, 1997) and “mixed or trait models” (e.g., Bar-On, 1997, Goleman, 1995 and Weisinger, 1998).
Mayer and Salovey’s (1997) conceptualization constrains EI to a mental ability concept and separates it from social-emotional personality traits. EI is defined as a series of conceptually related mental abilities that can be divided into four branches: (1) perception of emotion, (2) emotional facilitation of thought, (3) understanding emotions, and (4) managing emotions.
To measure these branches empirically, the Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS; Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 1999) and the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT; Mayer, Salovey, Caruso, & Sitarenios, 2003) have been developed, which consist of performance tasks requiring responses that are evaluated against predetermined scoring criteria.
In contrast, mixed or trait EI conceptualizations are much broader and expand the meaning of this construct by integrating a wide range of personality characteristics under the umbrella term of emotional intelligence. While the ability approach has prompted the construction of performance measures of emotional abilities, mixed or trait models strongly rely on self-report measures (e.g., Bar-On, 1997, Goleman, 1995 and Schutte et al., 1998).
One important research issue refers to the evaluation of the convergent and discriminant validities of the proposed EI-measures. According to Mayer and Salovey, ability EI should be moderately correlated with other intelligences in order to demonstrate that it belongs to the domain of ‘intelligences’ but that it is also sufficiently distinct from traditional intelligences. On the other hand, Petrides and Furnham’s (2001) trait EI conceptualization regards EI as a trait within the domain of personality which should be exclusively related to personality dimensions.
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] 下一页
情绪智力情绪管理外文文献及翻译 第4页下载如图片无法显示或论文不完整，请联系qq752018766
