摘要本文主要通过解读浙教版与新版数学教材的等腰三角形这一节内容来进行对比，以此为例从知识点的描述语言、知识点的编排与关联度与习题的创新程度和实际应用性三个角度反映中日初中几何教材的差异。从而得到以下结论：46772

1. 新版数学对定义的描述语言侧重于详细说明，使得学生能够深入理解定义，而浙教版侧重精简语言，忽略了条件，从而破坏了数学的严谨性。

2. 浙教版在知识点的安排上，更符合我国学生的认知发展；新版数学的引入更接近生活。

3. 新版数学体现习题的典型性，浙教版注重数学与生活的结合，不过两个版本都还需要进一步提高应用题型与创新题型的比例。

这对浙教版几何方面的编写有借鉴意义。

毕业论文关键词：浙教版； 新版数学； 几何； 对比； 语言的严谨性； 习题的创新性

ABSTRACT：In this paper, through the interpretation of Zhejiang Education Edition and New Math isosceles triangle to compare the contents of this section, as an example from the knowledge description language, the degree of innovation and knowledge associated with the degree of choreography and practical application exercises three angles reflect the differences in Japanese junior high school geometry textbook. Resulting in the following conclusions:

1. The Tokyo version of the definition description language focused on details, so that students are able to deeply understand the definition, while Zhejiang teach language version focused on streamlining neglected condition, thereby undermining the mathematical rigor.

2.Zhejiang Education Press in the arrangement of knowledge points, more in line with the cognitive development of students; Tokyo edition introduced closer to life.

3. Tokyo edition reflects typical exercises, Zhejiang focus on the combination of mathematics and taught version of life, but the two versions are also needed to further improve the proportion of applications Questions and innovation.

This provides reference to the written version of the geometric aspects of Zhejiang Education Edition Textbooks.

Keywords：Zhejiang Education Edition; New Math; Geometry; Comparison; The rigor of language; The innovative of the exercises

 目 录

1.研究背景及其意义 3

1.1 研究背景 3

1.2研究意义 3

（1）为我国教材改动提供方向 4

（2）促进“轻负高质”教育理念的达成 4

（3）从教材改革推动教育质量的提升提出建议 4

2.研究设计 4

2.1研究对象 4

（1）知识的描述 4

（2）知识点的编排与关联 4

（3）习题的难度 5

（4）创新程度 5

2.2研究方法 5

（1）文献法 5

（2）内容分析法 5

（3）比较法 5

3.中日初中教材三角形比较（等腰三角形为主） 5

3.1  知识的描述 5

3.2  知识点的编排与关联 7