-
[摘要]婚内强行性交行为是指婚姻关系存续期间，在特定情形下，妻子以明示方式将自己不愿与丈夫进行性交的的真实意思告知丈夫，而丈夫仍违背妻子意志，以暴力、胁迫手段强行与妻子发生性关系的行为。国内外对于丈夫是否能成为强奸自己妻子的犯罪主体存在不同立法。学界对于婚内强行性交行为的定性主要有四类：无罪、侮辱罪或虐待罪、故意伤害罪、强奸罪。该行为原则上不构成强奸罪，但在共同犯罪(如轮奸)；因其违背妇女意志，暴力性交行为导致妻一方死亡的；离婚诉讼判决尚未生效期间；当众对妻暴力进行性交的；对象认识错误，即把妻子当做其他妇女而强奸；因感情不和而分居满6个月，且有书面分居协议证实夫妻已分居，丈夫仍然违背妻子意愿强行性交。这751种情形下构成特殊的自诉的强奸罪。38095
- 上一篇：中小型物流企业蓝色货运面临问题和对策研究
- 下一篇：论贞操权的精神损害赔偿
[毕业论文关键词]婚内强行性交行为、强奸罪、违背妇女意志
Abstract
Marital forced sex behavior is that During the duration of marriage in certain circu- mstances, to express his wife his reluctant to sexual intercourse with her husband of the real meaning of told her husband, wife and husband still not will, by violence, co- ercion forced to have sex with his wife's behavior. For her husband whether can be ra- ped his wife at home and abroad criminal legislation main body are different. Educat- ional circles for marital forced sex behavior qualitative mainly has four kinds: the cri- me of innocence, insult or abuse, intentional injury, rape. The author thinks that the behavior does not constitute a rape in principle, but in joint crime (for example:gang
rape) ;due to its violation of women will, violent sexual intercourse that resulted in the deaths of a wife of one party ;porce judgment has yet to take effect; during sexual intercourse of violence against his wife in public ;cognition mistake, where his wife for other women and rape ;With emotional discord and separation of six months, and have written separation agreement confirmed that the couple have been separated, hu- sband against his wife will still forced sexual intercourse.The seven cases constitute special prosecution of rape.
Keywords
Marital forced sexual intercourse ,rape,against women will.
首先，需要质疑的是，众多学者将婚内强行性交行为称为“婚内强奸”，这在逻辑上是不合理的。因为婚内只是个定语，这种表述实际上有将其直接纳入强奸罪中的嫌疑。[1]婚内强行性交行为是指婚姻关系存续期间，在特定情形下，妻子以明示方式将自己不愿与丈夫进行性交的的真实意思告知丈夫，而丈夫仍违背妻子意志，以暴力、胁迫手段强行与妻子发生性关系的行为。[2]
事实上，从1989-1999年大陆大规模“性文明”调查和《2010妇女年度权益报告》显示，2.8%的被调查妇女承认她们曾遭受过自己丈夫的性暴力，比例远高于婚外强奸案的发生率。家庭暴力、性暴力等传统侵害妇女权益行为仍然存在，甚至较为严重，中国妇女权利状况并不乐观。佛山首例“婚内强奸案”，一审判决丈夫无罪；1998年青浦法院判决王某某成立强奸罪等更是引起社会持续关注。 我国法律并未明确排除丈夫作为强奸罪的犯罪主体，亦未将婚内强行性交明确入罪化。这种不确定性和不可预期性使得法官拥有较大的自由裁量权，为了严格限制司法裁量权，文护司法的统一性，防止司法秩序混乱，我国急迫需要在刑事立法上对婚内强行性交行为作出明确定性。
本文主要研究婚内强行性交行为定性强奸罪的可行性问题。
一、国内外对婚内强行性交行为的制度研究及冲突
（一）中国立法
从《大清律例•刑律》、《大清新刑律》、《大清民律草案》、751法全书、《汉律》、1928年刑法典、1935年的修订，到现行刑法，经历了从肯定一夫多妻制、将“奸”字理解为不义之交，即婚外性行为、妻子完全没有性自主权，到对“奸”的理解可以包括夫妻间的性行为。[3]1980年我国《婚姻法》废除了第七条夫妻共同生活的规定，使得婚内强行性交行为入罪具有现实可能性。