- 上一篇：浅析激情犯罪的成因及预防
- 下一篇：网络第三方支付的法律问题研究
摘 要：近年来，烈性犬致人死亡事件频繁发生，许多鲜活的生命消失在烈性犬的爪牙之下，新闻报纸多有报导，已经逐渐成为人们关注的焦点之一，引发公众对社会公共安全的强烈担忧。本文正是以此为研究对象，重点分析在刑法中烈性犬致人死亡构成何罪。这一类的案件在法院的审理过程中，对于由于肇事犬主人的行为所造成的犯罪的定罪，通常都会产生不同的观点，一种观点是以以危险方法危害公共安全罪定罪，另一种观点则是以过失致人死亡罪定罪。文章从两种罪名的具体概念谈起，详细阐述了两种罪名的区别以及对于肇事犬主人的行为定以危险方法危害公共安全罪的理由和定过失致人死亡罪的不恰当之处。希望本文的分析能够给法学相关领域带来帮助。56722
毕业论文关键词：烈性犬致人死亡，刑法分析，理由，不恰当之处，解决办法。
Abstract : In recent years ,the fierec dog to death events occur frequently , mang lives disappeared under the fierec dog claws , newspapers have reported , has gradually become the focus of attention , cause strong public concern about the social public security . This paper is to study , focusing on criminal law in the fierce dog killing people constitute what crime . Such a case at the trial court , the conviction because the dog owner’s behavior caused by crime , usually will have a different point of view , a view is to the crime of endangering public safety crime , another view is based on negligence crime death conviction . The concept from two kind of charge about , elaborated inappropriate death caused by differences between two kind of charges for the owners and the acts of the crime of endangering public safety reasons and neglience . I hope this analysis can help to law related fields .
Keywords : Deaths caused by a fierce dog ; criminal analysis ; reason ; inappropriate ; solution
目录
引言 5
一、案例 5
二、烈性犬的解释 5
四、国内外关于烈犬致人死亡的规定及其刑法上的理论分析 6
五、本案定性为以危险方法危害公共安全罪符合罪刑相适应原则 7
六、本案定性为以危险方法危害公共安全罪符合该罪的构成要件 8
（一）主体方面 8
（二）客体方面 8
（三）主观方面 9
（四）客观方面 9
七、以危险方法危害公共安全罪和过失致人死亡罪的区分 10
（一）客体方面 10