视频分享网站的著作权侵权问题研究

菜单

摘要视频分享网站在中国方兴未艾，由此引发的一系列著作权侵权问题也接踵而来。视频分享网站是一个为用户交流传播信息提供平台的信息存储空间，当其本身并不直接上传视频文件时，其性质是单纯的网络服务提供者；当其主动介入信息的传播时，其性质就转变为网络服务提供者与网络内容提供者的混合体。67211

视频分享网站著作权侵权的本质是侵犯信息网络传播权，侵权的方式分为直接侵权和间接侵权两种，间接侵权又进一步分为帮助侵权和替代侵权。与传统的侵权行为一样，视频分享网站的著作权侵权行为也以加害行为、损害事实、因果关系以及主观过错这四个方面为构成要件。在侵权责任的免除上，我国借鉴了西方国家的“避风港规则”，规定了“明确标识信息”、“未改变上传作品”、“不知也不应知侵权行为的存在”、“未直接获得经济利益”、“及时删除”这五方面的免责事由。

对于视频分享网站著作权侵权这一新兴网络著作权问题，我国的现有立法已经有了一些零星的规定，在司法实践中基本可以运用，但仍还存在未对“间接侵权”作出具体规定、对于“明知或应知”的认定标准不明确、对于“通知删除”程序规定模糊等一些问题，应当予以完善，引入“间接侵权”制度，明确“明知或应知”的认定标准及明确“通知—删除”的具体程序。

毕业论文关键词视频分享网站信息网络传播权间接侵权避风港原则

毕业论文外文摘要

Title Study on Copyright Infringement of the

Video Sharing Website

Abstract

With the Video sharing website being in the ascendant in China, a series of problems caused by the infringement of the copyright also follow close on succession. The video sharing website is only an information storage space that provides a platform for the users to exchange information. When the website itself does not directly upload video files, its legal identity is the Internet Service Provider. While when it exchange the information by itself, it will change into the admixture of the Internet Service Provider and the Internet Content Provider.

The essence of the copyright infringement of the video sharing website is infringing the right of information network dissemination．There are two kinds of way to infringe the copyright: direct infringement and indirect infringement, and the indirect infringement includes help and alternative infringing copyright. As the traditional tort, the video sharing website's copyright infringement consists of four constitutive requirements: the tort ,the damage fact, the causality and the fault. On the exemption of liability for tort, we draw lessons from the western countries "safe harbor principle" and make five grounds for exemption：note the information, not change the content, not know the infringement, not directly get the interests, already delete the information.

For the emerging problem of network copyright infringement, the existing legislation of our country has some sporadic regulations which can be used in the judicial practice. But there are still some problem such as not including indirect infringement system, not making the standard of" know or should know" clear, not making the procedure of" notification- delete" specific which should be improved. we should draw the indirect infringement system into our law ,make the standard of "know or should know"clear and make the procedure of "notification-delete" specific.

Keywords Video sharing website the right of communication through information network indirect infringement safe harbor principle